Dear Match of the Day team,
The BBC's Match of the Day was a staple of any football crazy person growing up. In the days before wall to wall coverage of live games, it was the only way to see any action from a game if you were unable to be there yourself. It was also a show where the presenters and commentators gave very little away of their allegiances for a specific team.
That all changed with the arrival of Gary Lineker. For once we had a presenter who had played the beautiful game at the very highest level. He knew the game better than anyone who'd been in the gig before. Gary's arrival also saw a line of pundits who'd also played the game at a high level. For the football fan this was a great idea on the face of it, but unfortunately it presented an unforeseen problem: bias.
A succession of pundits over the years have given their views, some better than others, but most have come from long careers at one particular club. Some have more or less succeeded in being impartial, but increasingly others don't even pretend to be impartial.
Showing your support for your team is OK, but it must not colour your judgement when it comes to your analysis. You must remember that not everyone watching has the same level of attachment or club affiliation as you. If it comes across as being too sycophantic, it's not a good watch.
What's also clear is that most pundits have associations with the "big six" clubs. Manchester United, Liverpool, Chelsea, Arsenal, and Manchester City players feature heavily, as do other big clubs like Newcastle. Do former players from Bournemouth and Brighton not also know their stuff?
Things have got a little better recently with the likes of former goalkeepers Shay Given and Joe Hart. They provide a interesting perspective from the golden boot club of Alan Shearer, Ian Wright, and Gary Lineker himself. Throw in Alex Scott, Dion Dublin, and the excellent Kelly Somers, and you've a DEI policy to make Donald Trump smart. That's a good thing by the way!
Going back to our Gary, there's a lot I like about his presenting style. Yes his love of Leicester can get a bit tiresome, but he can laugh at himself. That was evident when he followed up his promise to present in his underwear if Leicester won the Premier League. He's not afraid to speak his mind on matters he believes are important to draw attention to, and been treated very harshly by BBC management at times as a result.
That brings me back to the issue of bias and impartiality. The controversy over the government's immigration policy was a storm in a teacup. Should he have said what he said? That depends largely on whether you agreed with what he said. Personally I think he had every right to speak out. After all it was on a public platform that had nothing to do with his BBC job. I just wish the cringing bias we regularly see for the big clubs from the programme's presenters and pundits was toned down a few notches.
So over to you team. The arrival of Kelly Cates, Mark Chapman, and Gabby Logan next season is an excellent team to change a few things. Kelly and Mark in particular are great presenters, and Gabby, although a tough watch at times, stands her ground. Let's have the likes of some non-Premier League pundits occasionally. It's time for the old order to make way for some new ideas.